MANTIS

Compare · TraderSync

Mantis vs TraderSync.

TraderSync is a solid trade journal. Mantis is a journal plus the institutional intelligence that gives entries their context. Different tool, different price, different outcome.

Where TraderSync actually excels.

No vendor copy is going to admit a competitor is good at something. We will, because it's true.

Broker integrations are deep.

TraderSync syncs directly with a long list of US-focused brokers — TD Ameritrade, IBKR, Tradier, Webull, and many others. If you trade through a broker on their list, the import is one-click and historical. That's a meaningful advantage if you've got years of trade history to bring in.

The analytics dashboard is mature.

Eight years of product iteration shows. Win rate by ticker, by setup, by day-of-week. P&L curves, drawdown views, time-of-day breakdowns. TraderSync's analytics surface is broader than most journals and more configurable than Mantis Pattern Analytics currently is.

The simulator works.

TraderSync's playback feature lets you replay your own trade history bar-by-bar to study what you saw in the moment. It's an underrated training tool and Mantis does not have an equivalent.

Where Mantis is doing something different.

Context lives at the trade, not separately.

TraderSync records what you did. Mantis records what you were looking at — the institutional options flow into the symbol, the sentiment, the macro regime, the related thesis you had logged. Three months later, the trade still carries its reasoning. The journal becomes a reference document, not a P&L spreadsheet with sentiment-after-the-fact notes.

Mantis is also where your next trade comes from.

TraderSync is a journal — by design, it tells you about the past. Mantis is a journal plus the daily Smart Money digest, the macro regime, the AI earnings summaries, the whale tracker. The next setup is in the same app as the review of the last trade. The workflow loop closes.

Mantis is mobile-first.

TraderSync is a desktop-first product with a mobile companion. Mantis is the opposite — a phone-first app where the workflow assumes you're logging trades and reviewing context from your pocket. Both work on both. The defaults are different.

Side by side.

Capability TraderSync Mantis
Broker direct import Wide US broker support. One-click historical imports. CSV import from 10 brokers. No direct API broker sync at v1.
Trade journal Mature. Eight years of feature accretion. Per-leg exit ledger, AI context at entry, share-card view.
Pattern analytics Broader surface area than Mantis today. More chart types. Win rate by tag, hour, day-of-week, setup. Less configurable, more opinionated.
Playback simulator Yes. Bar-by-bar replay of your trade history. Not at v1.
Institutional options flow Not in product. Daily curated digest, push notifications, AI narratives.
13F whale tracking Not in product. Ten institutions, quarterly, with overlap analysis.
Earnings call AI summary Not in product. Three-list extract: highlights, guidance, risk factors.
Macro regime score Not in product. Six signals into one score, refreshed through the session.
Portfolio risk view P&L and drawdown only. Capital at Risk in dollars, R-multiples, concentration alerts, options multiplier-aware.
Pricing (Pro/equivalent) TraderSync Pro $79.95/mo. Mantis Pro €39.99/mo (~$44 USD).

The honest verdict.

Pick TraderSync if you already trade through a broker on their list, you have years of history to import, and what you want is the deepest possible journal-and-analytics surface. Pick Mantis if you want a journal plus the institutional intelligence that informs entries — and if you'd rather your tooling lived in your pocket than on a desktop tab. The decisive question is what stage of trading you're in: TraderSync is for the trader who already has setups and needs better analytics on them. Mantis is for the trader who wants better setups, better journaling, and lower total spend.

Try Mantis free for 14 days.

No credit-card vendor lock-in. Cancel from the app any time.